So what reciprocal enforcement of judgments act? The Civil and Commercial Procedures Law stipulated some cases for the expedited enforcement of judicial rulings and in the third chapter of the law entitled “Expedited Enforcement,” Article 287 stipulates, “It is not permissible to enforce judgments forcibly as long as appealing them by appeal is permissible unless expedited enforcement is specified in the law or ordered in the decision, however, preventive measures may be taken according to it.
Article 288 stipulates that expedited enforcement without a bond is obligatory by the force of law for judgments issued in summary matters.
Whatever court issued them, and orders issued on petitions unless the judgment or order provides for the provision of a bond.
Article 290 specifies cases of expedited enforcement of judgments.
Stating that an order for expedited enforcement, with or without bail, may be ordered in the following circumstances:
Decisions are issued for the payment of expenses, wages, and salaries.
If the judgment was issued in implementation of a previous decision that has the force of the required order or is covered by the expedited execution without bail.
Or if it was based on an official document that was not challenged for forgery when the convicted person was a litigant in the previous judgment or a party to the bond.
What are the Terms of reciprocal enforcement of the judgments act? The judgment is valid for compulsory execution in the following cases:
Expedited judicial enforcement due to urgency in execution:
This is the general rule in expedited judicial enforcement.
The preliminary ruling may be included in an obligation of expedited enforcement if the stakeholder requests the element of urgency in the request.
Part of urgency is available if the delay in implementation results in severe harm to the interests of the convicted person.
The requester estimates this damage to include the judgment for expedited execution, and the court will re-evaluate it.
The judge has broad discretionary power to extract the severe injury, and the requester must prove this damage and prove the extent of its seriousness.
If during the passage of time, one or more of the heirs disposes of immovable property that has not been settled, independently of the rest of the heirs.
It shall be considered that he disposed of it on behalf of or by proxy on behalf of the rest of the heirs, unless there is strong evidence that this disposal was not in that manner.
Considering the previous paragraph, if the plaintiff to recover the immovable property is a minor or incompetent.
The period shall start from the date the plaintiff becomes an adult or incompetent.
To fulfill the purpose of the previous paragraph:
The second article about reciprocal enforcement of judgments act Notwithstanding what is stated in any other legislation:
The period of passage of time does not apply to immovable funds in which the settlement has taken place.
The lease term of immovable property may not exceed ninety-nine years, and if it is held for a more extended period, it shall be returned to ninety-nine years.
Despite what is stated in any other law, the period of passage of time does not apply to immovable funds in which the settlement has taken place.
Despite what is contrary to this in any other law, registration restrictions and royal decrees related to state property and lands are considered.
Their content is judged and worked in the courts without evidence.
And these are all related articles about reciprocal enforcement of the judgments act.
At the end of the articles, we mentioned the reciprocal enforcement of the judgments act.
for read more visit facebook page